Murderer George Zimmerman claims to be 2.5 million dollars in debt.

By | 2018-05-27T15:01:25+00:00 May 27th, 2018|Categories: News|Tags: , , , |17 Comments

Could not happen to a more deserving POS.

Courtesy of the AP:

The ex-neighborhood watch volunteer who killed a black teen in Florida in 2012 says he’s $2.5 million in debt and has no income.

George Zimmerman filed paperwork detailing his financial state as he fights a misdemeanor stalking charge.

The Orlando Sentinel reports a public defender filed a not-guilty plea for Zimmerman and a request for a jury trial.

Zimmerman is accused of sending threatening messages to private investigator Dennis Warren. Warren had contacted Zimmerman about a documentary series on the slain Trayvon Martin that’s being produced by rapper Jay Z. A sheriff’s report says Warren received numerous calls and texts from Zimmerman in December.

The first question which occurs to me is how in the hell did Zimmerman manage to convince people that he would be able to pay back any money that he was lent?  

And then my second question is how do we know he is not lying?

After all, Zimmerman has been caught in almost as many lies as the current occupant of the White House.

Well if he owes this kind of money I imagine that he will be right back in court facing his creditors shortly. 

And if he is lying, well perhaps they will simply just lock him up and throw away the key now. 

After all, that is certainly where he belongs. 

About the Author:

This blog is dedicated to finding the truth, exposing the lies, and holding our politicians and leaders accountable when they fall far short of the promises that they have made to both my fellow Alaskans and the American people.

17 Comments

  1. Old Redneck May 27, 2018 at 4:34 am

    So . . . Who’s ready to set up a GoFundMe page for poor oil’ George? Anyone? Anyone?

  2. Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 6:19 am

    He could always start a Political Action Committee. George’s PACn

  3. ANONYMOUS May 27, 2018 at 6:52 am

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/hannah-arendt-really-mean-banality-evil/

    TRUE or Not>‘the banality of evil’-” The Stranger (1942), who randomly and casually kills a man, but then afterwards feels no remorse. There was no particular intention or obvious evil motive: the deed just ‘happened’.”

    “Aeon is a registered charity committed to the spread of knowledge. Our mission is to create a sanctuary online for serious thinking.”

    https://aeon.co/?utm_campaign=republished-article

  4. Beaglemom May 27, 2018 at 6:58 am

    Why doesn’t he get a job like other people do?

    • Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 7:29 am

      Who of reputable character would hire him?

  5. anonymous May 27, 2018 at 7:02 am
  6. Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 7:26 am

    Like the old Duracell battery commercial decades ago where Robert Conrad dares you to knock it off his shoulder, the not guilty verdict convinced this punk that he is invincible. I hope he lives the rest of his life looking over his shoulder because there are plenty more than willing to take him out.

  7. Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 11:04 am

    Curious, do you Gryphen, or any of you, consider OJ Simpson guilty of murder, more accurately guilty of a vicious double murder?

    • Gryphen May 27, 2018 at 11:06 am

      Of course, OJ was guilty.

      He all but admitted it in the years since the murders.

      That entire trial was a farce.

      • Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 12:38 pm

        Ok. But in the court of Law, they both were deemed not guilty, and cannot be retried again.

        So I guess I’m just curious, with all due respect, as to why Zimmerman is so repeatedly vilified in your blog, as compared to someone like OJ, who is widely believed to have murdered not one but two persons in cold blood by slashing their throats? In Zimmerman’s case at least he had the defense argument that he was ambushed by Martin, essentially getting pummeled (a defense argument that was verified by several witnesses as well as physical evidence).

        Not trying to troll you even if it seems to you that I am. I just find it curious is all, as to where and why and how people get latched onto media hype on certain events, when similar events happen every day around the country without ever making the news.

        For the record I believe they are both dirtbags and both have obviously had run-ins with the law after their famous trials.

        • anonymous May 27, 2018 at 2:00 pm

          President Carter KNEW-He told Garcetti>OJ WOULD be found ‘NOT GUILTY” Before the trial. OJ left his finger print on the gate and he wore ‘those Bruno Magli shoes’ and “the glove”
          “the bulk of the tapes involved Fuhrman discussing an organized group of male LAPD officers known as MAW, or Men Against Women” In the tapes, Fuhrman calls women “frail little objects” who “watch soap operas” and that “females lack the one ingredient that makes them an effective leader and that is testosterone, the aggressive hormone.” Fuhrman also stated on the tapes that “you’ve got to be able to shOOt people, beat people beyond recognition, and go home and hug your little kids. [Women] don’t pack those qualities.” Fuhrman was also recorded stating that women who were good leaders “are either so ugly or they’re a lesbian or they’re so dyke-ish that they are not women anymore.”
          “In further interviews, Fuhrman made the statements “we had them begging that they’d never be gang members again, begging us” and that he would tell black people “You do what you’re told, understand, Ni&&er?”
          “Earlier in the trial, Fuhrman testified that he had not used the word “Ni&&er” within the last ten years, which proved later to be perjured testimony with the admission of the tapes. His recorded words as well as his denial was a major blow to the prosecution’s case.”Fuhrman was charged with perjury for his testimony at the trial. He pleaded no contest. After paying a $200 fine, Fuhrman was released from his probation in April 1998 and the conviction was later expunged from his record”

          “That’s when I knew I had a big problem,”

          “Garcetti sought out the advice of former President Jimmy Carter, who was in LA for his work with Habitat for Humanity.

          “We met and what he told me was a punch to the stomach,”

          “Carter looked at me and said, ‘Gil, forget it, they are going to find him NOT GUILTY. The verdict will be about PAYBACK.’

          “‘There have been too many blacks who have been convicted and even executed. O.J. is not going to do it again,’ ””<RIGHT

          https://nypost.com/2016/04/10/former-da-gil-garcetti-i-never-wanted-marcia-clark-on-oj-trial/

          • Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 2:13 pm

            BERN>
            Mark Fuhr-man is a PIG.
            Fuck him & Fuck oj simpson.

          • Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 3:51 pm

            Interesting find 2:00pm.

            I don’t remember ever reading anything previously about conversations between the DA and former President Carter about the OJ trial.

            Looks like my night is screwed, I’ll be up on the internet pouring thru the old OJ stuff again to see if I can find out any more about Carter’s discussions, and if any other Presidents had open thoughts about the OJ trial, during or after. The whole circus was fascinating to watch from the lawyers to the media to Fuhrman to Kato Kaelin the Judge and to OJ himself. Hell who doesn’t remember watching the slow car chase to his house in real time on TV?

            Sadly, the media circus really overshadowed the fact that two people were brutally murdered, and their families and loved ones have had to deal with that reality ever since.

  8. Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 4:08 pm

    Is that what you people think? OJ did it now?

  9. whatevs May 27, 2018 at 8:25 pm

    @ Anon @ 12: 38 – not at all similar. Previous romntic relationship between OJ and Nicole. Zimmerman’s was a hate rtime. No go crawl back under your bridge, troll.

    • Anonymous May 28, 2018 at 6:51 am

      You calling it a hate crime, does not make it a hate crime 8:25. That is simply your opinion that you are stating as if it were a fact, and it most definitely is not.

      The ‘facts’ if you will, are that there was no crime at all in the eyes of the court, committed by either OJ or Zimmerman.

      You are correct that the situations are not at all similar in many aspects. One of them being there was never any denial by Zimmerman that he shot Trayvon Martin, he fully admitted to shooting Martin in self defense. Simpson claimed he was not the killer.

      Speaking of ‘hate’ crimes, do you not think that the killer of Nichole Brown and Ron Goldman was NOT full of hate? The cases are similar in the fact that they became spectacles bigger than the event itself, pushed by mass media (it is good business to keep viewers glued to the idiot boxes).

      If you do want a similar case… here is one for you, look up the case of Roderick Scott. It is similar in the fact that Roderick Scott was a grown man (42, much older than Zimmy), and he shot and killed a 17 yo youth. Although unlike in Zimmerman’s case, Scott was never actually assaulted, he claimed he fired in self defense, however he was never touched. Zimmerman was in fact getting a beat down when he fired his pistol. Roderick Scott was acquitted by the way.

      Here, I’ll get you started:
      https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/roderick-scott/
      https://www.decodedscience.org/roderick-scott-the-black-george-zimmerman-acquitted-of-murder/33569

      Now here is the quiz for you… Why did you never hear of the Roderick Scott case, and why was there never the same outrage and media hype? Man shoots teen and is acquitted right?

      By the way 8 killed and 25 wounded in Chicago shootings this Memorial Day weekend in Chicago (so far, still time left). Where is the outrage?

Comments are closed.