Family of student killed in Sante Fe school shooting to sue parent of gunman.

By | 2018-05-28T06:03:46+00:00 May 27th, 2018|Categories: News|Tags: , , , , |7 Comments

Damn skippy!

Courtesy of the AP:

The family of one of the students killed in a Texas high school shooting filed a lawsuit against the alleged gunman’s parents, claiming the shooter’s father didn’t properly secure the weapons and were negligent in entrusting him with firearms.

Authorities charged Dimitrios Pagourtzis, a 17-year-old student at Santa Fe High School, with capital murder in the May 18 attack that killed eight students and two substitute teachers. Investigators said Pagourtzis used a shotgun and pistol belonging to his father that had been kept in a closet.

Texas law states that guns can’t be made accessible to children under 17, with exceptions such as hunting or when under parent supervision. Parents can be charged with a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail and $4,000 in fines if the child fires the weapon and causes serious injury or death.

Christopher Stone and Rosie Yanas, whose son Chris Stone, 17, was killed, filed a lawsuit in Galveston County on Thursday. Stone’s funeral was Friday.

The lawsuit also argued that Pagourtzis’ parents didn’t obtain mental health counseling for their son and didn’t warn the public about his “dangerous propensities.” Dimitrios Pagourtzis posted a photo of a T-shirt emblazoned with the phrase “Born to Kill” on social media, and Gov. Greg Abbott has said the teenager had journals with writings indicating he planned the attack.

I am all for this and think it should become standard procedure for victims of school shootings. 

Especially if the shooter is a teen. 

I work with teens suffering from mental health problems, behavioral issues, or developmental delays, and I and tell you that just being a teenager should be classified in the DSM as a preexisting mental health condition which renders the sufferer incapable of making predictably rational decisions and may include severe mood swings and episodes of temporary insanity. 

I would only allow these emotional powderkegs access to weaponry in only the most carefully controlled circumstances, and then immediately after the activity had concluded lock them away as if they were the fucking crown jewels. 

If you are the parent of a teenager you have to realize that you have an emotionally unstable individual living under your roof, who at any moment might drive the family car into a building, have unprotected sex with a hobo, or open fire in a mall or high school in response to a broken heart, a failed exam, or a large blemish in the middle of their forehead. 

The rational part of the human brain does not fully develop until at least age 25, THAT is when one should consider allowing that person to access guns. And not before. 

And in the case of a person with a diagnosed behavioral or mental health issue, that time period should be extended to whenever a qualified psychiatrist signs off on their ability to control their impulses and have deemed them emotionally stable. 

Just imagine the number of lives that would be saved if everybody honored those criteria. 

About the Author:

This blog is dedicated to finding the truth, exposing the lies, and holding our politicians and leaders accountable when they fall far short of the promises that they have made to both my fellow Alaskans and the American people.

7 Comments

  1. Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 4:13 pm

    …He finally tells his side of his 2008 Sarah Palin partnership. With what time he has left, the “maverick” — an appellation he has worn throughout his career, at some times more comfortably than at others — is going to put country first and tell the truth.

    He expresses regret that he did not pick Joe Lieberman to be his running mate 10 years ago. His best friend, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), “enthusiastically endorsed the idea” of bringing their colleague, who had been the 2000 Democratic vice-presidential nominee, onto “a national unity ticket.” But everyone else in McCain’s circle told him it would fatally divide the GOP. “It was sound advice that I could reason for myself,” McCain writes. “But my gut told me to ignore it, and I wish I had.”

    McCain attributes the insufficient vetting of Palin, 44 and two years into her first term as Alaska’s governor, to his sulking about not being able to tap Lieberman. Taking the blame for her stumbles, he writes, “She was a skilled amateur performer asked to appear on Broadway twice a day.” I wish he had grappled more fully with the mayhem Palin’s selection created inside the GOP. It laid the groundwork for the ascent of Donald Trump a few years later.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/john-mccain-reflects-on-his-maverick-past-and-the-future-of-the-country/2018/05/23/95ef9930-5dc3-11e8-9ee3-49d6d4814c4c_story.html

  2. anonymous May 27, 2018 at 7:54 pm

    eonline>
    “Sesame Street’s creators are not happy—and they know it…

    Sesame Workshop, the nonprofit parent company responsible for the production of children’s show Sesame Street, has filed a lawsuit against STX Productions over its new film, The Happytime Murders, a bawdy puppet movie starring Melissa McCarthy.

    According to documents obtained by E! News, the suit, filed in federal court in New York on Thursday, claims that the raunchy comedy “tarnishes” the beloved show’s “trusted brand,” taking issue with the unauthorized use of the Sesame Street in the “violent and sexually explicit” trailer and with the film’s tagline, “No Sesame. All Street.”

    “Defendants’ widely distributed marketing campaign features a just-released trailer with explicit, profane, drug using, misogynistic, violent, copulating and even ejaculating puppets,”

    The suit claims, “Defendants do not own, control or any right to use the Sesame Street mark. Instead they are delivering a trailer that deliberately confuses consumers into mistakenly believing that Sesame was associated with, has allowed, or has even endorsed or has even produced the movie and tarnishes Sesame’s brand.”

    Additionally, the suit states, “The threat of irreparable injury posed to Sesame’s mark can not be overstated.””

  3. A. nonymius May 27, 2018 at 8:34 pm

    It was a different world pre-internet.

    Now, most people will Facebook Live a man on fire instead of throwing a bucket of water on him. If it helps their image and gets some clicks.

  4. Anonymous May 27, 2018 at 10:05 pm

    DAMN Skippy! I hope this kid’s father has his guns taken away. He has no sense of personal responsibility. He actually said his murderer son was “the victim”. Perhaps they should both be sterilized too.

  5. anonymous May 28, 2018 at 8:14 am

    OT? #1 I$$ue ABORTION?
    “Chris Hayes talked about this New York magazine article last night that theorizes that Trump got Playboy playmate Shera Bechard pregnant and used businessman Elliott Broidy to pay her $1.3 million in hush money.

    The probable payoff for Broidy? Consulting contracts from the United Arab Emirates worth up to $600 million over five years.”

    https://crooksandliars.com/2018/05/why-it-looks-trump-got-playmate-pregnant?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=crooksandliars.com&utm_term=68739&utm_content=2241047

  6. AnotherAnon May 28, 2018 at 7:16 pm

    Good.

    This should be standard for every parent who has lost a child due to gun violence. Sue whoever is responsible for that gun. How many times have we read in these recent shootings that the shooter was using the parent’s gun or in one case, the parents were given the guns by the police for safe-keeping and then RETURNED THEM TO THE SHOOTER…..TWICE!!!!

    Since nothing has worked, follow the money. And then take it away. Money is all some people understand. When it starts to empty their pocket books and impact their bottom lines, then maybe they’ll start to take our growing gun addition seriously

Comments are closed.