Despite Donald Trump’s tweet to the contrary the FBI has received no instructions to broaden the Kavanaugh investigation.

By | 2018-09-30T13:25:26+00:00 September 30th, 2018|Categories: News|Tags: , , , , , , |8 Comments

I think somebody is yanking us. 

Courtesy of NYT:

The FBI has received no new instructions from the White House about how to proceed with its weeklong investigation of sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, a senior U.S. official and another source familiar with the matter tell NBC News.

According to the sources, the president’s Saturday night tweet saying he wants the FBI to interview whoever agents deem appropriate has not changed the limits imposed by the White House counsel’s office on the FBI investigation — including a specific witness list that does not include Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct in high school.

Also not on the list, the sources say, are former classmates who have contradicted Kavanaugh’s account of his college alcohol consumption, instead describing him as a frequent, heavy drinker. The FBI is also not authorized to interview high school classmates who could shed light on what some people have called untruths in Kavanaugh’s Senate Judiciary Committee testimony about alleged sexual references in his high school yearbook.

The sources said nothing would preclude the FBI from asking Kavanaugh’s high school friend Mark Judge, who is on the witness list, about Swetnick’s allegations, but the sources stressed that this is not a top priority.

Separately, a White House official made clear that the White House is the client in this process. This is not an FBI criminal investigation — it is a background investigation in which the FBI is acting on behalf of the White House. Procedurally, the White House does not allow the FBI to investigate as it sees fit, the official acknowledged; the White House sets the parameters.

Trump tweeted yesterday that the earlier story by the New York Times was incorrect and that the FBI could “interview anyone they deem appropriate.” 

However, that has clearly not happened.


Michael Avenatti and his client have not been contacted as of yet either.


Okay, so all we have heard so far is that the FBI has made contact with Deborah Ramirez. the woman whose face Kavanaugh stuck his dick into, and nobody else. Is that right?

According to the updated New York Times story the FBI is still not allowed to contact the Safeway that Kavanaugh pal Mark Judge worked at to get an idea of his work schedule, nor are they allowed to investigate why Kavanaugh’s description of his drinking habits in college contradict those shared by his schoolmates. 

Those would seem to be areas that would clear up a whole lot of questions so why wouldn’t those areas be part of the investigation?

Or is THAT perhaps the very reason they are off limits? 

When Trump heard that people were questioning this investigation, he quickly responded with yet another tweet.

Yeah, it’s the Democrats that are the problem here.

If this whole thing is going to be a giant coverup, it is up to all of us to call it out as a giant coverup. 

And that is exactly what we are going to do. 

About the Author:

This blog is dedicated to finding the truth, exposing the lies, and holding our politicians and leaders accountable when they fall far short of the promises that they have made to both my fellow Alaskans and the American people.

8 Comments

  1. Anonymous September 30, 2018 at 4:17 pm

    It’s a farce. Trump and Republicans are trying to appease the public when they have no intention of having this thing thoroughly investigated. They are an evil lot and I am sick to death of them. Please make them go away!

    • Anonymous October 1, 2018 at 8:12 am

      Yep and it is giving Collins, Flake and Murkowski a “way out” for voting yes.

      There have been several articles about his drinking and lying about getting in Yale, so he lied to the committee which would disqualify him. As well as lying in the first “interview”. They have more than enough to vote NO already without a FBI investigation.

      Also why didn’t anyone on the committee ask him if he can provide proof of the left wing conspiracy and revenge by the Clintons.

      I also think they need to talk to Renate, he protested too much, leave her out of this because she is a nice girl, I wonder what else went on.

  2. Comey September 30, 2018 at 7:14 pm

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/james-comey-on-fbi-kavanaugh-probe_us_5bb13340e4b0c7575966396c

    “Although Comey did not address specific restrictions the White House has reportedly imposed ― including limiting which people can be interviewed ― he did criticize the seven-day time limit.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/30/opinion/james-comey-fbi-kavanaugh-investigation.html

  3. Anon September 30, 2018 at 11:44 pm

    The FBI must investigate Rachel Mitchell. The male gop judicial senators selected this woman to ask questions. Oddly she only ask questions of ms ford and not brett. This was not a trial nor deposition. It was a shabby question session of the victim. This woman from Arizona is buddies with the trump pardon sheriff joe arpario. Both are bias republican operatives. Why was she selected? Is she tainted? Bribed to cast doubt? Extorted? Threatened ? She was not hired to give opinion nor to write a memo. She has attempted to illegally cast doubt in a bogus memo. Why would she ruin her career? It is very odd. The republicons continue to lie cheat and steal. It must stop now. May their god punish their souls and bring justice to the victims of America.

  4. Anon October 1, 2018 at 4:28 am

    Could Avenatti bring Swetnick and go talk to Flake, Collins, Murkowski, etc on their own?

    • Anonymous October 1, 2018 at 8:00 am

      Sounds like he is going to the media.

  5. Anon October 1, 2018 at 7:41 am

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jim-carrey-lindsey-graham-portrair_us_5bb1ae0be4b0c75759667501

    @JimCarrey
    Ever wonder why women don’t report sexual abuse? Look no further than the hideous and hateful face of Lindsey Graham who offered nothing but anger and absolute disdain to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford following her courageous, and very credible, testimony. Talk about “a disgrace.”

    • Anonymous October 1, 2018 at 8:03 am

      Miss Lindsey said he is going to vote for Brett even if the claims of sexual assault are true.

      When is he up for re election? Maybe the women of South Carolina need to send him a message.

Comments are closed.