Colorado passes bill that would award state’s electoral votes to candidate who won the popular vote nationally.

By |2019-02-03T09:29:24+00:00February 4th, 2019|Categories: News|Tags: , , , |7 Comments

Sounds like a good plan to me. 

Courtesy of The Hill:

The Colorado Senate this week passed a bill that would award the state’s electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the nationwide popular vote.

The Senate passed the measure along party lines in a 19-16 vote Tuesday, sending the bill to the state House for consideration.

The bill, known as the national popular vote interstate compact, was sponsored by state Sen. Mike Foote (D), would require Colorado members of the Electoral College to cast their vote for the winner of the national popular vote.

The state’s nine electoral votes currently go toward the candidate who wins the majority of votes in Colorado.

The national popular vote interstate compact is an agreement among 11 states and the District of Columbia, but would only go into effect if there are enough electoral votes to influence the final Electoral College vote tally.

The states in the pact have 172 electoral votes — 98 short of the 270 needed to win the Electoral College.

I think it is time to simply do away with the electoral college and put the vote back into the hands of the individual voter. 

I think would inspire a greater turnout and make it much harder to steal the presidency. 

I know for instance in Alaska that people do not vote because they just assume that the state’s three electoral votes will always go to the Republican candidate. 

If that were not the case I think more people would feel that their vote really mattered. 

About the Author:

This blog is dedicated to finding the truth, exposing the lies, and holding our politicians and leaders accountable when they fall far short of the promises that they have made to both my fellow Alaskans and the American people.


  1. anon February 4, 2019 at 6:59 am - Reply

    A Reddit user who goes by justasapling posted, “The 30% of Americans who still love Trump are mostly probably on board with Mitch in front of the Confederate flag and Steve King and Northam.

  2. anon February 4, 2019 at 7:25 am - Reply

    “taking steps to change state party rules, crowd out potential rivals and quell any early signs of opposition that could embarrass the president.”
    “rump’s campaign has deployed what it calls an unprecedented effort to monitor and influence local party operations. It has used endorsements, lobbying and rule changes to increase the likelihood that only loyal Trump activists make it to the Republican nominating convention in August 2020.”
    ” a senior adviser to the Trump campaign, calls it all a “process of ensuring that the national convention is a television CONmercial for the president for an audience of 300 million and not an internal fight.”

  3. OK February 4, 2019 at 7:50 am - Reply

    Data clearly shows that if most Freshman Democrats don’t turn on @SpeakerPelosi and vote for the wall and stop being a rubber stamp, they will not have a chance to see their Sophomore class. @cnn and @msnbc ignores this fact because they are complicit in playing them.

  4. $BM~JB$ February 4, 2019 at 7:59 am - Reply

    “It should be noted that none of the cases Judge Proctor cited to support this novel legal rule even come close to supporting it. And a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit tossed out Porter’s “clearest proof” standard last July. “Recklessly plucked from an unrelated line of precedent,” Judge Charles Wilson wrote of Proctor’s attempt to immunize racist lawmakers from suits, “this requirement runs contrary to decades of established equal protection jurisprudence.”
    “There’s now a very real risk that Proctor’s “clearest proof” test will become the law in several Southern states.

    Nor is Proctor’s opinion an isolated incident. To the contrary, it is part of a much larger pattern from top Republican advocates, Republican judges, and top Republican advocates who became Trump judges, to hamstring any suit alleging racial discrimination by lawmakers. Indeed, some of these opinions go even further than Proctor — not simply trying to boot civil rights cases out of court, but suggesting that the mere allegation that a lawmaker acted with racist intent is itself an unforgivable $IN.”

  5. anon February 4, 2019 at 8:35 am - Reply

    “Put the vote back into the hands of the individual voter”.

    Well said.

  6. Anonymous February 11, 2019 at 6:24 pm - Reply

    Doing away with the electoral college would require a Constitutional amendment and that is not going to happen.

    This work around, however, is the easiest way to eliminate the electoral college without changing the constitution.

    Of course you know the states that would never pass similar laws. That’s why it’s still 98 votes short.

Leave A Comment

Protected with IP Blacklist CloudIP Blacklist Cloud